What's the difference between the two (web 2.0 and web 1.0)?

Would you be in breach of copyright if you put the Curtin logo at the top of your web page for an assignment? This information may be difficult to find so be prepared for a search and some independent thought! (Paraphrase the answer).

From what I can find on the Curtin web site: http://www.copyright.curtin.edu.au/research/curtin_owned.cfm

Curtin University material

Material in which Curtin University owns copyright, and which is not classified as "Confidential", may be copied without any requirement for special permission to be granted. (Notification of the originator would be a courtesy.)
There are no limits to the amount that can be copied or the form of reproduction or communication. Access should normally be restricted to Curtin staff and students.
Make it clear on any copies or communication of the material that Curtin is the copyright owner.

The use of Curtin logo for students’ assignment appeared to be effective and suitable. However, the use of logo is not necessarily needs a formal letter of permission from the originator of the image and the copyright. Considerably, if the logo is attached to the assignment and being published outside the Curtin organization it is legally imperative to ask for the copyright of the image and to be made known.

What's the difference between the two (web 2.0 and web 1.0)? (Paraphrase the answer).

Although content wise, the two lists appear identical yet its presentation style are largely dissimilar. Unlike the HTML page, the Blinklist is not a mere lists of links rather a page of invitation for interested individuals to join the community around the concept of creating links. However, the need of creating a log at the top page of the site will make you a member of the community and whatever links you choose to belong will have its own community rating system.

What are the benefits? (Paraphrase the answer).

HTML version is simply conveys information about links and neither interesting format nor additional content are available. Advantageous to an HTML version is its easy loading because of less content. The ratings scheme of Blinklist attracts me. Having this kind of feature is useful and relevant to people and good content can be recognized by the community and author receives recognition for it.

Which format do you think you would like better and why? (Paraphrase the answer).

Web 2.0 Blinklist is preferably practical to choose for it provides substantial content elements and allows us to create a personal account with information stored securely. Moreover, implementation of community around the information is the best way to ensure its relevance to the audience. This reality gradually makes applications to move far away from desktop programs and content availability is accessible to anyone.